From: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgpool versus which tool?
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:21:40 +0200
Message-ID: <e242051d-1150-e3d5-6964-60b2538de067@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABG8FoO4f=V8EWE0n8ofnU4ph6Nygpu964ZtiUF4X9fQGO7x8A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABG8FoO4f=V8EWE0n8ofnU4ph6Nygpu964ZtiUF4X9fQGO7x8A@mail.gmail.com>
Pierre Ochsenbein schrieb am 15.10.2018 um 09:38:
> Which best of tool you recommend to replace pgpool?
What's wrong with pgPool that you think you need to replace it?
And what is you requirement for such a tool?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: spam_eater@gmx.net, pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgpool versus which tool?
In-Reply-To: <e242051d-1150-e3d5-6964-60b2538de067@gmx.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox