pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>
To: Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Old WAL files under pg_xlog not getting delete
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:02:22 -0600
Message-ID: <faf76ac2-e371-791a-36b2-0941e6620ff0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALm_Vji8606+5bcqDHBfpwAoft532fyM3YH_XSkGQHhD+0KPWA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <aea0796a-9b55-aa75-4ad3-5377fc03e240@gmail.com>
	<201901310000.fkapsf6clz5s@alvherre.pgsql>
	<CAKFQuwZoawTQ5E05OY61cTaiXxcz6kom7gY0-_6wn9=Nqc6kHA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALm_Vjhf4AJF_=rvOMmmwKcaN3CN0YNnm7Q8RwivpLio8G+i7A@mail.gmail.com>
	<ff52b4a5-5232-abec-f148-a223b048f138@gmail.com>
	<CALm_Vji8606+5bcqDHBfpwAoft532fyM3YH_XSkGQHhD+0KPWA@mail.gmail.com>

"i had to run checkpoint manually to clean."

I see no problem with that.  Postgres would have checkpointed sooner or later.

On 1/31/19 10:22 AM, rammohan ganapavarapu wrote:
> Ron,
>
> I have changed the wal_keep_segments=100 and restarted the postgresql 
> processes but i still see 500+ files under pg_xlog, i had to run 
> checkpoint manually to clean.
>
> Ram
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:19 PM Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com 
> <mailto:ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 1/30/19 9:09 PM, rammohan ganapavarapu wrote:
>>     Thank you all, but irrespective of count i have why is it keeping old
>>     files?
>
>     Because you're telling it to!!
>
>     max_wal_size= 1GB
>     wal_keep_segments=500
>
>>     and how is it using those files? Is there any processes that can
>>     flush or remove those files?
>
>     Change the parameter and restart the server...
>
>>
>>     On Wed, Jan 30, 2019, 4:11 PM David G. Johnston
>>     <david.g.johnston@gmail.com <mailto:david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>         On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:00 PM Alvaro Herrera
>>         <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com <mailto:alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote:
>>         > Hmm ... I would recommend to keep the xlog files in a subdir,
>>         not the
>>         > root of the filesystem.
>>
>>         They are in a subdir (under /opt/pgdata), and the OP seems likely to
>>         have omitted the self/parent hidden directories during his check as
>>         well.  Plus per the docs we actually expect 501 so there isn't a need
>>         to account for 6 extra, just 5.
>>
>>         Dave
>>

-- 
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.

view thread (17+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <faf76ac2-e371-791a-36b2-0941e6620ff0@gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../faf76ac2-e371-791a-36b2-0941e6620ff0@gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/faf76ac2-e371-791a-36b2-0941e6620ff0@gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com, pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Old WAL files under pg_xlog not getting delete
  In-Reply-To: <faf76ac2-e371-791a-36b2-0941e6620ff0@gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox