From: Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
To: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Backup solution over unreliable network
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 12:17:27 +0200
Message-ID: <fb7e7296-c60e-c2cc-93d5-9c2451e9a2a5@matrix.gatewaynet.com> (raw)
Hello,
we've been running our backup solution for the last 5 months to a second site which has an unreliable network connection. We had problems with barman, since it doesn't support backup resume, also no
option to disable the replication slot, in the sense, that it is better to sacrifice the backup rather than fill up the primary with WALs and bring the primary down. Another issue is now supporting
entirely backing up from the secondary. With barman this is not possible, streaming (or archiving) must originate from the primary.So I want to ask two things here :
- Backing up to a remote site over an unreliable channel is a limited use case by itself, it is useful for local PITR restores on specific tables/data, or in case the whole primary suffers a disaster.
Is there any other benefit that would justify building a solution for it?
- I have only read the best reviews about PgBackRest, can PgBackRest address those issues?
Thank you!
--
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com, pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Backup solution over unreliable network
In-Reply-To: <fb7e7296-c60e-c2cc-93d5-9c2451e9a2a5@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox