From: PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
To: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Jonah H. Harris <jonah.harris@gmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>
Cc: David Tokmatchi <david.tokmatchi@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-novice@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] Postgres VS Oracle
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:27:00 +0200
Message-ID: <op.tt4n3aldcigqcu@apollo13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4676BE31.6040701@commandprompt.com>
References: <c50dbb0b0706180855v4b781f13m6e54c50aa3ab1dee@mail.gmail.com>
<36e682920706180910y519bc6a5h11e0ba56f45009ec@mail.gmail.com>
<4676B7C7.6020801@kostyrka.org>
<36e682920706181002i495f3fc3s2d55472e36a91b63@mail.gmail.com>
<4676BE31.6040701@commandprompt.com>
> 2. Oracle, Microsoft, and IBM have a "lot" to fear in the sense of a
> database like PostgreSQL. We can compete in 90-95% of cases where people
> would traditionally purchase a proprietary system for many, many
> thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of dollars.
Oracle also fears benchmarks made by people who don't know how to tune
Oracle properly...
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@peufeu.com, jd@commandprompt.com, jonah.harris@gmail.com, andreas@kostyrka.org, david.tokmatchi@gmail.com, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, pgsql-novice@postgresql.org, pgsql-general@postgresql.org, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] Postgres VS Oracle
In-Reply-To: <op.tt4n3aldcigqcu@apollo13>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox