public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Elein <[email protected]>
To: Katherine Mcmillan <[email protected]>
Cc: Valeria Kaplan <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL on K8 with Operator
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:42:52 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMsu0zE3zhvRp6XjdTn6QzXM_=A7H0J1Qr2ujNnuSXrmaTzjzQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMsu0zE3zhvRp6XjdTn6QzXM_=A7H0J1Qr2ujNnuSXrmaTzjzQ@mail.gmail.com>

Just a quick point. It is up to the purchaser of services to vet the services for their needs. 
One size does not fit all, especially in this open source community. 
Disparaging 1-person business would lose great resources as well as steady income for talented people. 

Elein Mustain
[email protected]
510-637-9106

> On Dec 8, 2020, at 9:19 AM, Katherine Mcmillan <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Just a question related to the list at: https://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_support/, is there any curation done for this listing?
> 
> I just wonder about a list that includes both well-established experts that focus on PostgreSQL (ex. EDB, Crunchy Data, Data Egret, PostgreSQL Experts, etc.) when companies with 1 employee and without a working website are also on that listing (ex. PostgreSQL International). Seems like there should be some basic standards for being listed, for example: you are a registered business, you have more than one employee (ie. you haven't just created a name for your one-person consultancy, there could be a separate listing for independent consultants), you have a working website and up-to-date contact information, you follow PostgreSQL community standards/OSS policies, etc.
> 
> There also seem to be a number of companies that would be difficult to categorize as "PostgreSQL specialists" considering the breadth of their work and expertise, ex. Heroku, Savoir-Faire Linux, Web Global Net, Moki Systems, etc. yet they are on that list.  This could be the start of a slippery slope.
> 
> Personally, I would struggle to pick out a reputable company with real expertise/focus on PostgreSQL from that listing at present, if I did not have any other familiarity with the companies.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Katie
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 5:19 AM Valeria Kaplan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Sasi,
>> 
>> Thank you for reaching out.
>> 
>> You will need to either contact individual companies that provide PostgreSQL services (you can google them or take a look here: https://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_support/) or you can also reach out to the community through Slack (postgresteam.slack.com) or Telegram (https://t.me/pg_sql) channels where individual consultants might be able to help.
>> 
>> We can't recommend a specific operator or comment on their expertise. 
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Valeria 
>> 
>> 
>> Valeria Kaplan
>> PostgreSQL advocacy
>> 
>> 
>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 3:54 AM SASIKUMAR Devaraj <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi All
>>> 
>>> Greetings.
>>> 
>>> I am looking for advise of running Postgres in K8 along with Operator.  Which Operator will be best for this solution? Is any company running the similar setup in Production?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Sasi


view thread (25+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: PostgreSQL on K8 with Operator
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox