pg.ddx.io  pgsql-benchmarks@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Michael Dean <mdean@sourceview.com>
Cc: Randolf Richardson <rr@8x.ca>
Cc: pgsql-benchmarks@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:41:08 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <200501141541.j0EFf8i29180@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41E207CE.50009@sourceview.com>

Michael Dean wrote:
> Also keep in mind that CA released Ingre (forerunner to Postgre), IBM 
> released the improved code from Informix, and Borland firebird.  So 

What source code has IBM released?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


> there are plenty of commercial grade RDBMS out there.
> 
> Randolf Richardson wrote:
> 
> >    	I'm looking for recent performance statistics on PostgreSQL vs. Oracle 
> >vs. Microsoft SQL Server.  Recently someone has been trying to convince my 
> >client to switch from SyBASE to Microsoft SQL Server (they originally wanted 
> >to go with Oracle but have since fallen in love with Microsoft).  All this 
> >time I've been recommending PostgreSQL for cost and stability (my own testing 
> >has shown it to be better at handling abnormal shutdowns and using fewer 
> >system resources) in addition to true cross-platform compatibility.
> >
> >    	If I can show my client some statistics that PostgreSQL outperforms 
> >these (I'm more concerned about it beating Oracle because I know that 
> >Microsoft's stuff is always slower, but I need the information anyway to 
> >protect my client from falling victim to a 'sales job'), then PostgreSQL will 
> >be the solution of choice as the client has always believed that they need a 
> >high-performance solution.
> >
> >    	I've already convinced them on the usual price, cross-platform 
> >compatibility, open source, long history, etc. points, and I've been assured 
> >that if the performance is the same or better than Oracle's and Microsoft's 
> >solutions that PostgreSQL is what they'll choose.
> >
> >    	Thanks in advance.
> >
> >---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> >  
> >
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
>                http://archives.postgresql.org
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073



view thread (16+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <200501141541.j0EFf8i29180@candle.pha.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../200501141541.j0EFf8i29180@candle.pha.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200501141541.j0EFf8i29180@candle.pha.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-benchmarks@postgresql.org
  Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, mdean@sourceview.com, rr@8x.ca
  Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
  In-Reply-To: <200501141541.j0EFf8i29180@candle.pha.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox