From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: 2467882606@qq.com
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18520: Different results when analyze a relation with UDT.
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:57:51 -0400
Message-ID: <1161093.1719241071@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18520-12e5636a81c059f2@postgresql.org>
References: <18520-12e5636a81c059f2@postgresql.org>
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> When analyzing a relation with UDT, an error will be encountered if there is
> a join before the analyze stmts. Error message is "ERROR: missing support
> function 1(16386,16386) in opfamily 16392".
What your example shows is a buggy (very incomplete) operator class.
This is not a Postgres bug.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, 2467882606@qq.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18520: Different results when analyze a relation with UDT.
In-Reply-To: <1161093.1719241071@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox