pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Subject: Re: BUG #17893: Assert failed in heap_update()/_delete() when FK modiified by RI trigger in non-read-committed xact
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:00:00 +0300
Message-ID: <1236e144-d772-7ff4-6e23-4ce91d0923ad@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b77078c0-090c-0f0e-6f13-3bb7daca93ee@gmail.com>
References: <17893-35847009eec517b5@postgresql.org>
	<b77078c0-090c-0f0e-6f13-3bb7daca93ee@gmail.com>

02.09.2023 16:00, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>
> Third, with this change applied I immediately got a failure of the next
> assert in heap_delete():
>             Assert(!ItemPointerEquals(&oldtup.t_self, &oldtup.t_data->t_ctid));
> which was introduced by 5db6df0c0.
Sorry for my mistake here. I had cited a wrong line. It should be:
         Assert(result != TM_Updated ||
                !ItemPointerEquals(&tp.t_self, &tp.t_data->t_ctid));

As I still can't see, which cases those asserts intended for, but see cases
when they are falsified, I propose removing them.
Please look at the complete patch attached.

Best regards,
Alexander

Attachments:

v1-01-fix-asserts-in-heap_update-delete.patch (text/x-patch, 5.5K) download diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c index 14de8158d4..b625a8e79d 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c @@ -2721,9 +2721,8 @@ l1: result == TM_Updated || result == TM_Deleted || result == TM_BeingModified); - Assert(!(tp.t_data->t_infomask & HEAP_XMAX_INVALID)); - Assert(result != TM_Updated || - !ItemPointerEquals(&tp.t_self, &tp.t_data->t_ctid)); + Assert(!(tp.t_data->t_infomask & HEAP_XMAX_INVALID) || + (result == TM_Updated && crosscheck != InvalidSnapshot)); tmfd->ctid = tp.t_data->t_ctid; tmfd->xmax = HeapTupleHeaderGetUpdateXid(tp.t_data); if (result == TM_SelfModified) @@ -3346,10 +3345,7 @@ l2: { /* Perform additional check for transaction-snapshot mode RI updates */ if (!HeapTupleSatisfiesVisibility(&oldtup, crosscheck, buffer)) - { result = TM_Updated; - Assert(!ItemPointerEquals(&oldtup.t_self, &oldtup.t_data->t_ctid)); - } } if (result != TM_Ok) @@ -3358,9 +3354,8 @@ l2: result == TM_Updated || result == TM_Deleted || result == TM_BeingModified); - Assert(!(oldtup.t_data->t_infomask & HEAP_XMAX_INVALID)); - Assert(result != TM_Updated || - !ItemPointerEquals(&oldtup.t_self, &oldtup.t_data->t_ctid)); + Assert(!(oldtup.t_data->t_infomask & HEAP_XMAX_INVALID) || + (result == TM_Updated && crosscheck != InvalidSnapshot)); tmfd->ctid = oldtup.t_data->t_ctid; tmfd->xmax = HeapTupleHeaderGetUpdateXid(oldtup.t_data); if (result == TM_SelfModified) diff --git a/src/include/access/tableam.h b/src/include/access/tableam.h index 230bc39cc0..ac7b279f32 100644 --- a/src/include/access/tableam.h +++ b/src/include/access/tableam.h @@ -1479,8 +1479,8 @@ table_multi_insert(Relation rel, TupleTableSlot **slots, int nslots, * TM_BeingModified (the last only possible if wait == false). * * In the failure cases, the routine fills *tmfd with the tuple's t_ctid, - * t_xmax, and, if possible, and, if possible, t_cmax. See comments for - * struct TM_FailureData for additional info. + * t_xmax, and, if possible, t_cmax. See comments for struct + * TM_FailureData for additional info. */ static inline TM_Result table_tuple_delete(Relation rel, ItemPointer tid, CommandId cid, diff --git a/src/test/isolation/expected/fk-snapshot.out b/src/test/isolation/expected/fk-snapshot.out index 5faf80d6ce..bdd26bac6c 100644 --- a/src/test/isolation/expected/fk-snapshot.out +++ b/src/test/isolation/expected/fk-snapshot.out @@ -122,3 +122,25 @@ a 1 (1 row) + +starting permutation: s2ip2 s1brr s1ifp2 s2brr s2dp2 s1c s2c +step s2ip2: INSERT INTO pk_noparted VALUES (2); +step s1brr: BEGIN ISOLATION LEVEL REPEATABLE READ; +step s1ifp2: INSERT INTO fk_parted_pk VALUES (2); +step s2brr: BEGIN ISOLATION LEVEL REPEATABLE READ; +step s2dp2: DELETE FROM pk_noparted WHERE a = 2; <waiting ...> +step s1c: COMMIT; +step s2dp2: <... completed> +ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update +step s2c: COMMIT; + +starting permutation: s2ip2 s1brr s1ifn2 s2brr s2dp2 s1c s2c +step s2ip2: INSERT INTO pk_noparted VALUES (2); +step s1brr: BEGIN ISOLATION LEVEL REPEATABLE READ; +step s1ifn2: INSERT INTO fk_noparted_sn VALUES (2); +step s2brr: BEGIN ISOLATION LEVEL REPEATABLE READ; +step s2dp2: DELETE FROM pk_noparted WHERE a = 2; <waiting ...> +step s1c: COMMIT; +step s2dp2: <... completed> +ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update +step s2c: COMMIT; diff --git a/src/test/isolation/specs/fk-snapshot.spec b/src/test/isolation/specs/fk-snapshot.spec index 378507fbc3..9fad57e768 100644 --- a/src/test/isolation/specs/fk-snapshot.spec +++ b/src/test/isolation/specs/fk-snapshot.spec @@ -13,6 +13,11 @@ setup CREATE TABLE fk_noparted ( a int REFERENCES fk_parted_pk ON DELETE NO ACTION INITIALLY DEFERRED ); + + CREATE TABLE fk_noparted_sn ( + a int REFERENCES pk_noparted ON DELETE SET NULL + ); + INSERT INTO pk_noparted VALUES (1); INSERT INTO fk_parted_pk VALUES (1); INSERT INTO fk_noparted VALUES (1); @@ -20,7 +25,7 @@ setup teardown { - DROP TABLE pk_noparted, fk_parted_pk, fk_noparted; + DROP TABLE pk_noparted, fk_parted_pk, fk_noparted, fk_noparted_sn; } session s1 @@ -28,6 +33,7 @@ step s1brr { BEGIN ISOLATION LEVEL REPEATABLE READ; } step s1brc { BEGIN ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED; } step s1ifp2 { INSERT INTO fk_parted_pk VALUES (2); } step s1ifp1 { INSERT INTO fk_parted_pk VALUES (1); } +step s1ifn2 { INSERT INTO fk_noparted_sn VALUES (2); } step s1dfp { DELETE FROM fk_parted_pk WHERE a = 1; } step s1c { COMMIT; } step s1sfp { SELECT * FROM fk_parted_pk; } @@ -38,6 +44,7 @@ session s2 step s2brr { BEGIN ISOLATION LEVEL REPEATABLE READ; } step s2brc { BEGIN ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED; } step s2ip2 { INSERT INTO pk_noparted VALUES (2); } +step s2dp2 { DELETE FROM pk_noparted WHERE a = 2; } step s2ifn2 { INSERT INTO fk_noparted VALUES (2); } step s2c { COMMIT; } step s2sfp { SELECT * FROM fk_parted_pk; } @@ -59,3 +66,11 @@ permutation s1brc s2brc s2ip2 s1sp s2c s1sp s1ifp2 s2brc s2sfp s1c s1sfp s2ifn2 # the same no matter the snapshot mode permutation s1brr s1dfp s1ifp1 s1c s1sfn permutation s1brc s1dfp s1ifp1 s1c s1sfn + +# trying to delete a row through DELETE CASCADE, whilst that row is deleted +# in a concurrent transaction +permutation s2ip2 s1brr s1ifp2 s2brr s2dp2 s1c s2c + +# trying to update a row through DELETE SET NULL, whilst that row is deleted +# in a concurrent transaction +permutation s2ip2 s1brr s1ifn2 s2brr s2dp2 s1c s2c

view thread (6+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1236e144-d772-7ff4-6e23-4ce91d0923ad@gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../1236e144-d772-7ff4-6e23-4ce91d0923ad@gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1236e144-d772-7ff4-6e23-4ce91d0923ad@gmail.com

 ·  · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: exclusion@gmail.com, andres@anarazel.de
  Subject: Re: BUG #17893: Assert failed in heap_update()/_delete() when FK modiified by RI trigger in non-read-committed xact
  In-Reply-To: <1236e144-d772-7ff4-6e23-4ce91d0923ad@gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox