public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Jacob Champion <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Schreiber <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 17: Bug in libpq when libpq is dlopened/closed multiple times
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:13:28 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOYmi+=ezP7DSyTKh9xy3ejTxydrVicBYBYeoVZOWgYvAyjDxA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
	<CAOYmi+=e9bQQa1jgLqZ18m5w-7KA44VeL9FON6i2gd8bi=d5Jw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOYmi+kac3wEE3iqxHfHCNd_n2i-Or=n+Qk8_G24UZn2uz3DyQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAOYmi+=ezP7DSyTKh9xy3ejTxydrVicBYBYeoVZOWgYvAyjDxA@mail.gmail.com>

Jacob Champion <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 12:23 PM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Should we write the arguments as BIO_TYPE_NONE | BIO_TYPE_SOURCE_SINK
>> rather than just BIO_TYPE_SOURCE_SINK?

> Good question... Popularity-wise, the shorter spelling shows up across
> quite a few projects on GitHub, but the only spelling of
> `BIO_meth_new(BIO_TYPE_NONE | ...)` that I can find is a single place
> inside OpenSSL's own test suite -- which also uses the shorter
> alternative, in two places. So my vote is BIO_TYPE_SOURCE_SINK; we'll
> be in good company.

Fair enough.

			regards, tom lane

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 17: Bug in libpq when libpq is dlopened/closed multiple times
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox