From: PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: hellojo180@yahoo.es
Subject: BUG #15988: Improve ANALYZE-statement
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 19:06:55 +0000
Message-ID: <15988-808a474b052d2a83@postgresql.org> (raw)
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 15988
Logged by: Jo Tzschenscher
Email address: hellojo180@yahoo.es
PostgreSQL version: 11.5
Operating system: RHEL
Description:
Hello,
PLEASE ROUTE THIS PROPOSAL TO A DEVELOPMENT TEAM, IT PROPOSES AN IMPROVED
FEATURE RATHER THAN A BUG
I was just stumbling over the ANALYZE-statement, without providing a
table-name. It shall analyze the entire schema. But maybe it would be good
to exclude a table, so a better version would be
ANALYZE [-<table1> -<table2>] to exclude the tables which should be
excluded, but all of the rest should be included. รง
Thank you for listening. Cheerio.
Jo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, hellojo180@yahoo.es
Subject: Re: BUG #15988: Improve ANALYZE-statement
In-Reply-To: <15988-808a474b052d2a83@postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox