pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Cc: Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 00:44:35 -0400
Message-ID: <1624905.1730436275@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+hUKGLRXq0-s0n2=dy_A5iY-Omg628osyJEJMjPQ=6m566UgA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4496616.iHFcN1HehY@portable-bastien>
	<af84e934-4e9c-4380-95ee-8921dab1254b@iki.fi>
	<1156374.1730396928@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<7ec1c65c-1a28-49a7-af43-f77c260a3df6@iki.fi>
	<1292593.1730399134@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+hUKGLRXq0-s0n2=dy_A5iY-Omg628osyJEJMjPQ=6m566UgA@mail.gmail.com>

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 7:25 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> It occurs to me to wonder whether the existing code works on Windows.
>> Windows-on-ARM wasn't a thing we thought about in 2018, but it's
>> a reasonable target now.

> I looked into that[1] and decided that I was going to ignore it
> completely, because:
> [ oodles o' details ]

Hmm.  So it seems like we could do this:

* Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD: do run-time test as recommended
* Windows, macOS: assume that supported ARM hardware can do this
* anything else: assume no hardware CRC

The only thing I'd be even a bit sad about there is not having
NetBSD support.  Maybe we just need to research that a bit more,
or maybe we have to wait for/lobby for them to do what the other
BSDen have done.  But in any case I'm not seeing NetBSD-on-ARM
as a platform that's important enough to block movement on this,
let alone anything else in the "anything else" category.

An alternative to "assume no hardware CRC" could be

* anything else: use the existing SIGILL test

But I do sympathize with Bastien's concerns about that.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (37+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1624905.1730436275@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../1624905.1730436275@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1624905.1730436275@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, thomas.munro@gmail.com, hlinnaka@iki.fi, rouca@debian.org, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal
  In-Reply-To: <1624905.1730436275@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox