pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: BUG #14830: Missed NOTIFications, PostgreSQL 9.1.24
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:19:48 -0400
Message-ID: <16671.1507645188@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171010140621.u4avva4cxylwpyew@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20171010140621.u4avva4cxylwpyew@alvherre.pgsql>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-bugs>

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm ... I suppose it's possible that that happens if the listening
>> backend isn't executing any SQL commands but is just sitting.
>> While that might describe your test harness, does it describe any
>> real-world application?

> I think it's not totally unreasonable to have processes sitting idle for
> long periods of time.

Sure, but if they're truly idle, they aren't looking at RecentXmin ;-)

> Would they not recompute RecentXmin if they did a
> sinval reset?

Not sure, but if not, maybe making that code path update it would be
a suitable fix in practice?  I'm a bit hesitant to put a GetSnapshotData
call into ProcessIncomingNotify, because of the possibility of adding a
lot of contention on the ProcArray if there's very heavy notify traffic.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs



view thread (15+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <16671.1507645188@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../16671.1507645188@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/16671.1507645188@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, marko@joh.to, michael.paquier@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: BUG #14830: Missed NOTIFications, PostgreSQL 9.1.24
  In-Reply-To: <16671.1507645188@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox