pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: exclusion@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Subject: Re: BUG #17056: Segmentation fault on altering the type of the foreign table column with a default
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 18:10:29 -0400
Message-ID: <1806408.1623363029@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17056-4f6f7243d322be6b@postgresql.org>
References: <17056-4f6f7243d322be6b@postgresql.org>

PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> CREATE FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER dummy;
> CREATE SERVER s0 FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER dummy;
> CREATE FOREIGN TABLE ft1 (c1 integer NOT NULL) SERVER s0;
> ALTER FOREIGN TABLE ft1 ADD COLUMN c8 integer DEFAULT 0;
> ALTER FOREIGN TABLE ft1 ALTER COLUMN c8 TYPE char(10);

Hmm.  The equivalent DDL on a plain table works fine, but this is
crashing in the code that manipulates attmissingval.  I suspect some
confusion about whether a foreign table column should even *have*
attmissingval.  Andrew, any thoughts?

			regards, tom lane





view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1806408.1623363029@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../1806408.1623363029@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1806408.1623363029@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, exclusion@gmail.com, andrew@dunslane.net
  Subject: Re: BUG #17056: Segmentation fault on altering the type of the foreign table column with a default
  In-Reply-To: <1806408.1623363029@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox