pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: reshkekirill@gmail.com
Subject: BUG #19023: Table DDL default column expression depending on temp objects
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 13:32:24 +0000
Message-ID: <19023-0a5a85a44ec3f0c6@postgresql.org> (raw)

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference:      19023
Logged by:          Kirill Reshke
Email address:      reshkekirill@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 18beta3
Operating system:   any
Description:        

I have found two cases when user can define a relation, which has temp
objects in its DEFAULT expression.
First example is:
```
reshke=# create temp sequence s1;
CREATE SEQUENCE
reshke=# create table tt(i int default nextval('s1'));
CREATE TABLE
```
I think it is a bug that PostgreSQL allows this DDL to successfully
complete. There is a validation for this type of DDL already, example:
```
reshke=# create table ttx(i int default nextval('s3'));
ERROR:  relation "s3" does not exist
LINE 1: create table ttx(i int default nextval('s3'));
                                               ^

```

Since PostgreSQL already checks for its nextval() input, we can teach server
to also validate relation relpersistence, arent we?

Second example is with tables:
```
reshke=# create temp table  x();
CREATE TABLE
reshke=# create table y (i int default nextval('x'));
CREATE TABLE
reshke=# insert into y default values ;
ERROR:  cannot open relation "x"
DETAIL:  This operation is not supported for tables.

```

WDYT? Is this indeed a bug?



view thread (2+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <19023-0a5a85a44ec3f0c6@postgresql.org>
Permalink:  ../19023-0a5a85a44ec3f0c6@postgresql.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/19023-0a5a85a44ec3f0c6@postgresql.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, reshkekirill@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: BUG #19023: Table DDL default column expression depending on temp objects
  In-Reply-To: <19023-0a5a85a44ec3f0c6@postgresql.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox