From: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 23:03:53 +0200
Message-ID: <20140530210353.GI30516@awork2.anarazel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140530203515.GS28490@momjian.us>
References: <20140530121631.GE25431@alap3.anarazel.de>
<20140530132916.GM28490@momjian.us>
<20140530133244.GG25431@alap3.anarazel.de>
<20140530150006.GP28490@momjian.us>
<20140530151317.GB1220@awork2.anarazel.de>
<20140530203515.GS28490@momjian.us>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-bugs>
On 2014-05-30 16:35:15 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:13:17PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > It'd need to be clusters that used more multixacts than fit onto two
> > slru offsets/ segments in < 9.2. Otherwise things will probably just
> > continue to work because there's no hole.
>
> Do you mean <= 9.2 here for the old cluster?
yes.
> Multi-xacts were added in 9.3:
That's not really correct. They were added in 8.2 or something...
> commit 0ac5ad5134f2769ccbaefec73844f8504c4d6182
> Author: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
> Date: Wed Jan 23 12:04:59 2013 -0300
>
> Improve concurrency of foreign key locking
That just expanded the usage to also be able to track updated rows.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: andres@2ndquadrant.com, bruce@momjian.us, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts
In-Reply-To: <20140530210353.GI30516@awork2.anarazel.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox