pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: clemens@ladisch.de, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: BUG #15833: defining a comment on a domain constraint fails with wrong OID
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:32:55 -0400
Message-ID: <20190611133255.GA13589@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190611045539.GB2132@paquier.xyz>

On 2019-Jun-11, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 08:55:27AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > -1 on this approach.  Having this ownercheck function return the owning
> > object ID seems way too strange.  I'd rather not have the new ownercheck
> > function, and instead do a syscache search to obtain the type OID in
> > check_object_ownership, then do pg_type_ownercheck.  I'm not even sure
> > that pg_domain_constraint_ownercheck makes a lot of sense in itself,
> > since it's never the constraint that requires an owner check.
> 
> I can see your point, yes perhaps I overdid it.  What do you think
> about the attached instead?  This moves the syscache lookup directly
> into check_object_ownership() as you suggest.

Yeah, looks better.  I think the error message should be a normal elog()
cache failure, though ... at least in the COMMENT case, the obj-does-not-
exist message is supposed to be thrown by get_object_address(), before
check_object_ownership is called.

As a matter of style, I would get rid of the 'conoid' variable and just
use address.objectId where needed.


-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services





view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20190611133255.GA13589@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20190611133255.GA13589@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20190611133255.GA13589@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, michael@paquier.xyz, daniel@yesql.se, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: BUG #15833: defining a comment on a domain constraint fails with wrong OID
  In-Reply-To: <20190611133255.GA13589@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox