From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: BUG #16104: Invalid DSA Memory Alloc Request in Parallel Hash
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:35:16 -0300
Message-ID: <20191210173516.GA10987@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210173224.y5vaam6ep7pjmddt@development>
On 2019-Dec-10, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> It's probably still a good idea to do this, although I wonder if we
> might start doing this only when actually running out of bits (and use
> the current algorithm by default). But I have no idea if that would be
> any cheaper, and it would add complexity.
I'm under the impression that this patch is proposed for backpatching,
and that in master we can simply increase the hash width.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com, thomas.munro@gmail.com, andres@anarazel.de, jtc331@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #16104: Invalid DSA Memory Alloc Request in Parallel Hash
In-Reply-To: <20191210173516.GA10987@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox