pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 18:46:22 +0200
Message-ID: <20200409184622.390f9b7f@firost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200408135830.25a8e2ef@firost>
References: <20200402.130443.1791362864704140391.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
	<20200402.130734.613319908534820379.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
	<03900fc5-fff4-109a-fe69-83de2c167929@oss.nttdata.com>
	<20200402.162323.770257425358491539.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
	<ca964b3a-61a0-902e-c7b3-3abbc01a921f@oss.nttdata.com>
	<20200402154915.4984cff2@firost>
	<3d543ef2-ae02-5e59-3bfe-b79d00dab360@oss.nttdata.com>
	<20200403182625.0fccc6fd@firost>
	<4d48dbdb-e1db-a2d6-2fb2-c2a66efa7818@oss.nttdata.com>
	<20200407171736.61906608@firost>
	<20200408022345.GC1606@paquier.xyz>
	<20200408135830.25a8e2ef@firost>

On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 13:58:30 +0200
Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com> wrote:
[...]
> > May I ask why this new test is added to 011_crash_recovery.pl which is
> > aimed at testing crash and redo, while we have 002_archiving.pl that
> > is dedicated to archiving in a more general manner?  
> 
> I thought it was a better place because the test happen during crash recovery.
> 
> In the meantime, while working on other tests related to $SUBJECT and the
> current consensus, I was wondering if a new file would be a better place
> anyway.

So, 002_archiving.pl deals more with testing recovering on hot standby side
than archiving. Maybe it could be renamed?

While discussing this, I created a new file to add some more tests about WAL
archiving and how recovery deal with them. Please, find the patch in
attachment. I'll be able to move them elsewhere later, depending on the
conclusions of this discussion.

Regards,

Attachments:

  [text/x-patch] 0002-v3-Add-tests-relative-to-WAL-archiving.patch (0B, ../20200409184622.390f9b7f@firost/2-0002-v3-Add-tests-relative-to-WAL-archiving.patch)
  download

view thread (67+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20200409184622.390f9b7f@firost>
Permalink:  ../20200409184622.390f9b7f@firost/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20200409184622.390f9b7f@firost

 ·  · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: jgdr@dalibo.com, michael@paquier.xyz, masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com, horikyota.ntt@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery
  In-Reply-To: <20200409184622.390f9b7f@firost>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox