From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andrey Klychkov <aaklychkov@mail.ru>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Re[2]:
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 15:59:48 +0900
Message-ID: <20200528065948.GC3460@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5816.1590581923@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <1590486572.205117372@f500.i.mail.ru>
<cca87255-7dea-6aac-2e9a-35dfe3776122@2ndquadrant.com>
<1590501239.839686286@f437.i.mail.ru>
<17907.1590504619@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20200527074736.GG103662@paquier.xyz>
<5816.1590581923@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 08:18:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, but the OP is invoking this via reindexdb. Do we need to have
> anything about it on the reindexdb page?
I don't think we should have any duplication between the REINDEX and
reindexdb pages, and we have that in reindexdb:
--concurrently
Use the CONCURRENTLY option. See REINDEX for further information.
An idea would be to append to the second sentence something like
"where all the caveats of this option are explained in details"?
--
Michael
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (832B, ../20200528065948.GC3460@paquier.xyz/2-signature.asc)
download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, aaklychkov@mail.ru, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Re[2]:
In-Reply-To: <20200528065948.GC3460@paquier.xyz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox