pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: depesz@depesz.com, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 16:22:09 +0100
Message-ID: <20230206152209.yglmntznhcmaueyn@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD21AoBG2OSDOFTtpPtQ7fx5Vt8p3dS5hPAv28CBSC6z2kHx-g@mail.gmail.com>

On 2023-Feb-06, Masahiko Sawada wrote:

> I've also confirmed that this issue is fixed by the attached patch,
> which clears candidate_restart_lsn and friends during
> ReplicationSlotRelease().

Hmm, interesting -- I was studying some other bug recently involving the
xmin of a slot that had been invalidated and I remember wondering if
these "candidate" fields were being properly ignored when the slot is
marked not in use; but I didn't check.  Are you sure that resetting them
when the slot is released is the appropriate thing to do?  I mean,
shouldn't they be kept set while the slot is in use, and only reset if
we destroy it?

(But, actually, in that case, maybe we don't need to reset them: instead
we need to make sure to ignore the values for slots that are not in_use.
However, I don't know what the semantics are for these "candidate"
fields, so maybe this is wrong.)

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/





view thread (57+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20230206152209.yglmntznhcmaueyn@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20230206152209.yglmntznhcmaueyn@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20230206152209.yglmntznhcmaueyn@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, sawada.mshk@gmail.com, amit.kapila16@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  In-Reply-To: <20230206152209.yglmntznhcmaueyn@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox