pg.ddx.io pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Subject: Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:52:04 -0700
Message-ID: <20240415205204.57.nmisch@google.com> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <CA+Tgmobh6b+8Kg2P0J__ML5KDh8bJwNYZvWED_oPB=MnBaqoWQ@mail.gmail.com >
References: <20240304000717.1e@rfd.leadboat.com >
<CA+TgmoaHcqdTNFuSZJrBAhqV9p+Gp9A3w2eN-YMSu_vHd3N3+g@mail.gmail.com >
<CAEze2WjMTh4KS0=QEQB-Jq+tDLPR+0+zVBMfVwSPK5A=WZa95Q@mail.gmail.com >
<CA+TgmoafLryvjQb-sP743EaR3K3x5yZ-N2htMFQ1JFVMJyUwHQ@mail.gmail.com >
<CAAKRu_ZiE6AXAgzGhyCYVTCS0bn-g=zDhC2QHfFLGcQmdyxRLQ@mail.gmail.com >
<CA+TgmoZk19atnje-pCoj2CVuPS5FnGZdVsbqJ0vNZOvcXhYmqA@mail.gmail.com >
<CA+Tgmob1BtWcP6R5-toVHB5wqHasPTSR2TJkcDCutMzaUYBaHQ@mail.gmail.com >
<CAAKRu_aq0oZS88NxN9gEW9Ff-HK6AegTZ0FdC8C4fOZdXbwx+A@mail.gmail.com >
<CA+TgmoYUnV-RYzn00jF2irua29mdb0vqgH-LjPHiSJZG_tUQVg@mail.gmail.com >
<CA+Tgmobh6b+8Kg2P0J__ML5KDh8bJwNYZvWED_oPB=MnBaqoWQ@mail.gmail.com >
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 12:35:59PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I propose to remove this open item from
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_17_Open_Items
>
> On the original thread (BUG #17257), Alexander Lakhin says that he
> can't reproduce this after dad1539ae/18b87b201. Based on my analysis
I have observed the infinite loop in production with v15.5, so that
non-reproduce outcome is a limitation in the test procedure. (v14.2 added
those two commits.)
> of the code, I suspect that there is a residual bug, or at least that
> there was one prior to 6f47f6883151366c031cd6fd4011e66d2c702a90.
Can you say more about how 6f47f6883151366c031cd6fd4011e66d2c702a90 mitigated
the regression that 1ccc1e05ae introduced? Thanks for discovering that.
view thread (62+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <20240415205204.57.nmisch@google.com>
Permalink: ../20240415205204.57.nmisch@google.com/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/20240415205204.57.nmisch@google.com
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: noah@leadboat.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, melanieplageman@gmail.com, boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com, pg@bowt.ie, exclusion@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, andres@anarazel.de
Subject: Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae
In-Reply-To: <20240415205204.57.nmisch@google.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox