From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
To: ocean_li_996 <ocean_li_996@163.com>
Cc: mohen.lhy@alibaba-inc.com <mohen.lhy@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Re: BUG #19070: issue with DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY on a hash partition table
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 20:34:18 +0200
Message-ID: <202510111831.xmk4a6jrtrqm@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17a8f848.b7f6.199cf1e3b5e.Coremail.ocean_li_996@163.com>
On 2025-Oct-11, ocean_li_996 wrote:
> Based on the discussion in #18371 and my own investigation, I think the
> proposed fix is appropriate. I’m attaching patches for both the stable
> and master branches, FYI.
Yeah, looks good -- pushed to all branches since 14. One thing I
modified in branch master is that the test just above the new one is
testing that a constraint is being added, but that's no longer true, so
I removed some lines there.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"El número de instalaciones de UNIX se ha elevado a 10,
y se espera que este número aumente" (UPM, 1972)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@kurilemu.de, ocean_li_996@163.com, mohen.lhy@alibaba-inc.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Re: BUG #19070: issue with DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY on a hash partition table
In-Reply-To: <202510111831.xmk4a6jrtrqm@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox