pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: msdnchina@163.com
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18034: Accept the spelling "+infinity" in datetime input is not accurate
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 22:53:27 -0400
Message-ID: <26522.1691636007@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZNRN1aF0Ls2SbleN@momjian.us>
References: <18034-08e668401be826ed@postgresql.org>
	<ZNRN1aF0Ls2SbleN@momjian.us>

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> in the https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/release-16.html, there is a new
>> feature :Accept the spelling "+infinity" in datetime input。
>> Actually,"in datetime input " is not accurate.
>> Actually, in the PostgreSQL 16 beta2 edition, the spelling "+infinity" can
>> be used in the following three datatypes:
>> 1.timestamp [ (p) ] [ without time zone ]
>> 2.timestamp [ (p) ] with time zone
>> 3.date
>> 
>> and the spelling "+infinity" can not be used in the   following two
>> datatypes:
>> 1.time [ (p) ] [ without time zone ]
>> 2.time [ (p) ] with time zone

> We call our timestamp type datetime in some cases, e.g.:
> ...
> I see it in a few other places.  Should we rename it other places too? 
> I thought datetime was just a short-hand for our date-time types.

I don't see much reason to change anything here.  "Datetime" is not
a perfectly strict classification, eg it might or might not include
"interval" depending on context, and I don't want to try to make
that exact.

A more specific release note entry could be "Accept the spelling
'+infinity' for datetime types that accept infinity"; but I'm not
sure it's worth the extra verbiage.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (6+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <26522.1691636007@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../26522.1691636007@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/26522.1691636007@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, bruce@momjian.us, msdnchina@163.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: BUG #18034: Accept the spelling "+infinity" in datetime input is not accurate
  In-Reply-To: <26522.1691636007@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox