pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Loïc Revest <l.revest@apc.fr>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: lag() default value ignored for some window partition depending on table records count?
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 18:35:54 -0400
Message-ID: <276587.1651012554@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABkOrLve_F5PyQNL+BhnUCT1FRVF5QV6mfVAuhrharF_Ka+9eQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkOrLve_F5PyQNL+BhnUCT1FRVF5QV6mfVAuhrharF_Ka+9eQ@mail.gmail.com>

=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgUmV2ZXN0?= <l.revest@apc.fr> writes:
> Long story short:
> - We track history data in a partitioned table which boils down to  "key
> fields + a JSONB data column", the latter being a list of date/numeric
> values pair ;
> - For every of this date/numeric couple within their "window partitioning",
> we need to determine the preceding value, thus the use of lag(<value>, 1,
> 0::numeric), since it's relevant for us here to get the very first record
> of the partition having "0.00" as its preceding value;
> - Except that the "first" row of some partitions gets NULL instead of
> 0::numeric as the result of lag(<value>, 1, 0::numeric), while other get
> 0::numeric as expected;

Hm ...

> Attached is the test case database script we've been able to reproduce the
> "issue" one hundred percent of the time on, but without the data - even
> after compression this weights ∼8.5Mb. Data that I'd happily share would
> anyone points me towards the customary way to do it here with such "big" a
> file.

With no data, this is pretty pointless.  Maybe you could make a script
to fill the tables with some dummy data that reproduces the problem?

			regards, tom lane





view thread (6+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <276587.1651012554@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../276587.1651012554@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/276587.1651012554@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, l.revest@apc.fr, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: lag() default value ignored for some window partition depending on table records count?
  In-Reply-To: <276587.1651012554@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox