pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: krking@zju.edu.cn
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #17480: Assertion failure in parse_relation.c
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 20:04:15 -0400
Message-ID: <27736.1652227455@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202205101050.sepjyffoevsy@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <202205101050.sepjyffoevsy@alvherre.pgsql>

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> and with this it is clear that the problem is that the alias list is too
> long for the COLUMNS specification of the XMLTABLE function.

Check.

> This can be avoided by throwing an error:

+1, but you should match the ERRCODE thrown by buildRelationAliases,
that is ERRCODE_INVALID_COLUMN_REFERENCE.

Looking at the other addRangeTableEntry* functions, 
addRangeTableEntryForJoin seems to similarly lack a defense
against too many aliases.  Testing shows that the case is covered
elsewhere:

regression=# select * from (int8_tbl i cross join int4_tbl j) ss(a,b,c,d) limit 2;
ERROR:  column alias list for "ss" has too many entries
regression=# \errverbose 
ERROR:  42601: column alias list for "ss" has too many entries
LOCATION:  transformFromClauseItem, parse_clause.c:1458

but this is randomly different both in the message wording and in the
choice of ERRCODE.  I wonder if we shouldn't harmonize that, and maybe
move detection of the case to addRangeTableEntryForJoin for consistency
with the other cases.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <27736.1652227455@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../27736.1652227455@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/27736.1652227455@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, krking@zju.edu.cn, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: BUG #17480: Assertion failure in parse_relation.c
  In-Reply-To: <27736.1652227455@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox