From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Cc: Walker Philips <wphilips53@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pg_catalog.pg_proc procedure has correct proargnames array, but proargtypes is empty
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 20:54:58 -0400
Message-ID: <3559795.1657932898@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAApHDvr=w2Vv_Z8uk-Zoihz74qs=t7+w3k71eKOufS96pJy6ww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFssDw=Hs5i1VNAaafNdDdvMNCF0gh7f4x=D-Of1eUJDhGin5A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAApHDvr=w2Vv_Z8uk-Zoihz74qs=t7+w3k71eKOufS96pJy6ww@mail.gmail.com>
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> Can you share which version of PostgreSQL you see this on?
Hmm ... looking more closely, it's definitely not stock PG,
because proargtypes is oidvector which would not include any
curly braces in the output.
Hard to tell what's going on exactly; seems like it could be
corrupt catalog data or faulty code modifications. Or maybe
there's something wrong with whatever the viewing tool is?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, dgrowleyml@gmail.com, wphilips53@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_catalog.pg_proc procedure has correct proargnames array, but proargtypes is empty
In-Reply-To: <3559795.1657932898@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox