pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: adam@labkey.com, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 23:23:13 -0500
Message-ID: <75265.1732076593@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zz1bvchIEQPT6eTr@nathan>
References: <18711-7503ee3e449d2c47@postgresql.org>
	<3072825.1731866414@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<Zzzdc1QLIuFoiTvE@nathan>
	<3796535.1732044807@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<Zz0WPCEzx-mPvUxA@nathan>
	<3976665.1732057784@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<Zz1bvchIEQPT6eTr@nathan>

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 06:09:44PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Also, we could bypass the multiple lookups unless both the
>> NAMEDATALEN-1'th and NAMEDATALEN-2'th bytes are non-ASCII, which
>> should be rare enough to make it not much of a performance issue.

> I'm admittedly not an expert in the multi-byte code, but since there are
> encodings like LATIN1 that use a byte per character, don't we need to do
> multiple lookups any time the NAMEDATALEN-1'th byte is non-ASCII?

I don't think so, but maybe I'm missing something.  An important
property of backend-legal encodings is that all bytes of a multibyte
character have their high bits set.  Thus if the NAMEDATALEN-2'th
byte does not have that, it is not part of a multibyte character.
That's also the reason we can stop if we reach a high-bit-clear
byte while backing up to earlier bytes.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (67+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <75265.1732076593@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../75265.1732076593@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/75265.1732076593@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, nathandbossart@gmail.com, bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails
  In-Reply-To: <75265.1732076593@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox