pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Cc: Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:02:34 -0500
Message-ID: <865773.1732399354@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <736756.1732341046@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <4496616.iHFcN1HehY@portable-bastien>
	<af84e934-4e9c-4380-95ee-8921dab1254b@iki.fi>
	<1156374.1730396928@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<7ec1c65c-1a28-49a7-af43-f77c260a3df6@iki.fi>
	<1292593.1730399134@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+hUKGLRXq0-s0n2=dy_A5iY-Omg628osyJEJMjPQ=6m566UgA@mail.gmail.com>
	<707008.1732325995@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+hUKGJPrRow2aiUSK=aep5nyXUaB0gBoDJQKfyCsP=-ivfapg@mail.gmail.com>
	<736756.1732341046@sss.pgh.pa.us>

I wrote:
> But that developer.arm.com page seems pretty definitive.  Tomorrow
> I'll have a go at spinning up a 32-bit NetBSD installation and test
> it.  Thanks for the research!

Conclusions:

1. Unsurprisingly, a 64-bit kernel exposes machdep.cpuN.cpu_id but
not machdep.id_isar; a 32-bit kernel the reverse.

2. 32-bit userland does not provide <aarch64/armreg.h>.  (So I did
not try to use the ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1_CRC32 macro: we'd have had to
hard-code the field position anyway for 32-bit.)

3. It doesn't look to me like NetBSD really supports 32-bit userland
under a 64-bit kernel.  Maybe it'd kind of work, but utilities like
cpuctl seem to be built for only one of the kernel APIs.

So I end up proposing the attached.  If we do somehow find ourselves
running 32-bit with a 64-bit kernel, this will report "no CRC"
because the sysctl call will fail.  I don't think it's worth
sweating over that case.

BTW, I found out that by default we'll build a software-CRC-only
implementation on 32-bit ARM NetBSD, at least in the "generic"
eabihf build:

checking for __crc32cb, __crc32ch, __crc32cw, and __crc32cd with CFLAGS=... no
checking for __crc32cb, __crc32ch, __crc32cw, and __crc32cd with CFLAGS=-march=armv8-a+crc... no
checking which CRC-32C implementation to use... slicing-by-8

It turns out that -march=armv8-a+crc would work, except:

configure:17624: checking for __crc32cb, __crc32ch, __crc32cw, and __crc32cd with CFLAGS=-march=armv8-a+crc
configure:17648: ccache gcc -o conftest -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Werror=vla -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 -Wcast-function-type -Wshadow=compatible-local -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fexcess-precision=standard -Wno-format-truncation -Wno-stringop-truncation -g -O2 -march=armv8-a+crc    -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro  conftest.c -lz -ledit -lcurses -lpthread -lexecinfo -lrt -lm  >&5
cc1: error: '-mfloat-abi=hard': selected processor lacks an FPU

If you force it with a compatible -mfpu switch (I used -mfpu=neon)
then you get a build with runtime CRC check, and all seems to work.
I did not try very hard to determine what the default -mfpu is here
or why -march=armv8-a+crc overrides whatever the default is.  This
probably means that no end user is going to see any benefit from this
exercise, because they are not likely to try adding -mfpu by itself.
If they add "-march=armv8-a+crc -mfpu=whatever" to CFLAGS manually
then configure will deem that a runtime check is not required, so this
code still doesn't get exercised.

tl;dr: a lot of time spent on a probably-useless exercise.  Still,
now that we've got the code we may as well commit it.  The configure
issue was there all along.

			regards, tom lane

Attachments:

  [text/x-diff] v2-netbsd-arm-crc-detection.patch (2.0K, ../865773.1732399354@sss.pgh.pa.us/2-v2-netbsd-arm-crc-detection.patch)
  download | inline diff:
diff --git a/src/port/pg_crc32c_armv8_choose.c b/src/port/pg_crc32c_armv8_choose.c
index 306500154e..11e27978fd 100644
--- a/src/port/pg_crc32c_armv8_choose.c
+++ b/src/port/pg_crc32c_armv8_choose.c
@@ -31,6 +31,13 @@
 #endif
 #endif
 
+#if defined(__NetBSD__)
+#include <sys/sysctl.h>
+#if defined(__aarch64__)
+#include <aarch64/armreg.h>
+#endif
+#endif
+
 #include "port/pg_crc32c.h"
 
 static bool
@@ -52,6 +59,47 @@ pg_crc32c_armv8_available(void)
 #else
 	return (getauxval(AT_HWCAP2) & HWCAP2_CRC32) != 0;
 #endif
+#elif defined(__NetBSD__)
+	/*
+	 * On NetBSD we can read the Instruction Set Attribute Registers via
+	 * sysctl.  For doubtless-historical reasons the sysctl interface is
+	 * completely different on 64-bit than 32-bit, but the underlying
+	 * registers contain the same fields.
+	 */
+#define ISAR0_CRC32_BITPOS 16
+#define ISAR0_CRC32_BITWIDTH 4
+#define WIDTHMASK(w)	((1 << (w)) - 1)
+#define SYSCTL_CPU_ID_MAXSIZE 64
+
+	size_t		len;
+	uint64		sysctlbuf[SYSCTL_CPU_ID_MAXSIZE];
+#if defined(__aarch64__)
+	/* We assume cpu0 is representative of all the machine's CPUs. */
+	const char *path = "machdep.cpu0.cpu_id";
+	size_t		expected_len = sizeof(struct aarch64_sysctl_cpu_id);
+#define ISAR0 ((struct aarch64_sysctl_cpu_id *) sysctlbuf)->ac_aa64isar0
+#else
+	const char *path = "machdep.id_isar";
+	size_t		expected_len = 6 * sizeof(int);
+#define ISAR0 ((int *) sysctlbuf)[5]
+#endif
+	uint64		fld;
+
+	len = sizeof(sysctlbuf);
+	memset(sysctlbuf, 0, len);
+	if (sysctlbyname(path, sysctlbuf, &len, NULL, 0) != 0)
+		return false;			/* perhaps kernel is 64-bit and we aren't? */
+	if (len != expected_len)
+		return false;			/* kernel API change? */
+
+	fld = (ISAR0 >> ISAR0_CRC32_BITPOS) & WIDTHMASK(ISAR0_CRC32_BITWIDTH);
+
+	/*
+	 * Current documentation defines only the field values 0 (No CRC32) and 1
+	 * (CRC32B/CRC32H/CRC32W/CRC32X/CRC32CB/CRC32CH/CRC32CW/CRC32CX).  Assume
+	 * that any future nonzero value will be a superset of 1.
+	 */
+	return (fld != 0);
 #else
 	return false;
 #endif

view thread (37+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <865773.1732399354@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../865773.1732399354@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/865773.1732399354@sss.pgh.pa.us

 ·  · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, thomas.munro@gmail.com, hlinnaka@iki.fi, rouca@debian.org, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal
  In-Reply-To: <865773.1732399354@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox