pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:52:57 -0400
Message-ID: <905705.1634248377@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afb18939-3a80-e4a8-7204-404df363fdf1@dunslane.net>
References: <17212-34dd4a1d6bba98bf@postgresql.org>
	<CAH2-WzkwRUayddmb3uxCadV_y--DHfY+UMmjtOokiAO2xNh5fA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+Tgmoat1M4MAqUQM1H+bkWR=wXmi33bB0YRR=xaFk9ADs5Jeg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH2-Wzk3NzXYXsUKWBFuBm6aiXTh-_L2Dm9wPqfFenUvG+VbRw@mail.gmail.com>
	<543F3BF3-EDED-4C52-AF05-623921B6C409@enterprisedb.com>
	<CAH2-WzkXphRHgbaUXqMgb7SBmc_VbwdyWGYqphV6KbOH7stfxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<55A2BFE7-AAAF-4A64-BD3A-5C98EA982267@enterprisedb.com>
	<CAH2-WzniogVqNuWzNVLOKjkd8FBcSry29hN9=wiROUPw92fmGg@mail.gmail.com>
	<07159C9A-40DA-47BF-B2F4-! 203F5AC00890@enterprisedb.com>
	<CAH2-Wzkt-umhXfR1nqy=ZDXMfoN3LDK4W5VtchfWyRAuPWxtnA@mail.gmail.com>
	<40DB088B-C96F-49B2-BC84-BDC8D35C7E97@enterprisedb.com>
	<CAH2-Wzne7L9fX2LdZ9enNZpO2wuqbrsubCw2thH__CC_nZazjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<0B7DA7A4-2872-485B-BFDD-BF8E9BB07B26@enterprisedb.com>
	<CAH2-Wz=YnyANaKQDfx9pg0YNPS-LY66CXQrUzED4Rgm <726473.1634184950@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<b5ec84db-c5af-bfac-fe4! f-a704a364f90b@dunslane.net>
	<903461.1634245763@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<afb! 18939-3a80-e4a8-7204-404df363fdf1@dunslane.net>

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Yes, that's been puzzling me too. I've just been staring at it again and
> nothing jumps out. But maybe we can investigate that offline if this
> test is deemed not worth keeping.

As Mark says, it'd be interesting to know whether the use of
background_psql is related, because if it is, we'd want to debug that.
(I don't really see how it could be related, but maybe I just lack
sufficient imagination today.)

Beyond that, ISTM this is blocking all TAP testing on the Windows
machines, which is pretty bad to leave in place for long.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (83+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <905705.1634248377@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../905705.1634248377@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/905705.1634248377@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andrew@dunslane.net, pg@bowt.ie, mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, pashkin.elfe@gmail.com, exclusion@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
  In-Reply-To: <905705.1634248377@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox