pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: git@rmr.ninja
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #16199: pg_restore stuck on interrupts
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 12:13:35 -0500
Message-ID: <9845.1578503615@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16199-cb2f121146a96f9b@postgresql.org>
References: <16199-cb2f121146a96f9b@postgresql.org>

PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> We are seeing stuck pg_restore processes in several of our CI servers, both
> with PG10 (10.2) and PG11 (11.5).

You didn't actually say, but you must be interrupting parallel restores
with SIGINT or the like?

> I have a some extra processes with the same issue  (7 full stacks out of 20,
> the others are garbage) and, from what I see, they all have in common that
> the process has received a signal while it was doing a memory operation,
> either a malloc or a free:

Yeah.  Ugh :-(

> I think if would be safer to use a similar approach to other processes, that
> is use the handler to only enable a global flag and check that in the main
> loop, but I'm having a hard time locating what the proper place to check the
> flag would be.

I think the odds of that being an improvement are minimal --- you'd be
trading a risk of failure during exit for a risk of not exiting (in any
timely fashion) in the first place.

sigTermHandler tries to be safe to run in a signal context, but I'm
afraid we didn't think hard about what exit() might call.  The way
I'd be inclined to fix this is to call _exit() instead of exit(),
and the heck with what any atexit handlers think.  Can you try that
and see if it improves matters for you?

			regards, tom lane





view thread (6+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <9845.1578503615@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../9845.1578503615@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/9845.1578503615@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, git@rmr.ninja, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: BUG #16199: pg_restore stuck on interrupts
  In-Reply-To: <9845.1578503615@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox