pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:24:33 -0700
Message-ID: <BBE6CE62-1960-4A0D-89EB-73EF773FB802@enterprisedb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH2-Wz=7HKJ9WzAh7+M0JfwJ1yfT9qoE+KPa3P7iGToPOtGhXg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <17212-34dd4a1d6bba98bf@postgresql.org>
	<CA+TgmoYa5exExaONEnGBWRdi7A3=FKuKzewY8DXTj6+045wiFQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH2-WzkwRUayddmb3uxCadV_y--DHfY+UMmjtOokiAO2xNh5fA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+Tgmoat1M4MAqUQM1H+bkWR=wXmi33bB0YRR=xaFk9ADs5Jeg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH2-Wzk3NzXYXsUKWBFuBm6aiXTh-_L2Dm9wPqfFenUvG+VbRw@mail.gmail.com>
	<543F3BF3-EDED-4C52-AF05-623921B6C409@enterprisedb.com>
	<CAH2-WzkXphRHgbaUXqMgb7SBmc_VbwdyWGYqphV6KbOH7stfxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<55A2BFE7-AAAF-4A64-BD3A-5C98EA982267@enterprisedb.com>
	<CAH2-WzniogVqNuWzNVLOKjkd8FBcSry29hN9=wiROUPw92fmGg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH2-Wzkt-umhXfR1nqy=ZDXMfoN3LDK4W5VtchfWyRAuPWxtnA@mail.gmail.com>
	<40DB088B-C96F-49B2-BC84-BDC8D35C7E97@enterprisedb.com>
	<CAH2-Wzne7L9fX2LdZ9enNZpO2wuqbrsubCw2thH__CC_nZazjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<0B7DA7A4-2872-485B-BFDD-BF8E9BB07B26@enterprisedb.com>
	<726473.1634184950@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<b5ec84db-c5af-bfac-fe4f-a704a364f90b@dunslane.net>
	<02C6345B-D186-4F88-A976-A2CD1051CB93@enterprisedb.com>
	<903680.1634246015@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CAH2-Wz=7HKJ9WzAh7+M0JfwJ1yfT9qoE+KPa3P7iGToPOtGhXg@mail.gmail.com>



> On Oct 14, 2021, at 2:21 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> 
> I agree. I can go remove the whole file now, and will.
> 
> Mark: Any objections?

None of the "pride of ownership" type, but I would like to see something more about the limitations of background_psql().  It's the closest thing we have to being able to run things in parallel from TAP tests.  There's no isolationtester equivalent, and PostgresNode doesn't allow you to fork() in tests without hacking PostgresNodes END{} block.  So if we don't debug this, we never get any further towards parallel testing from perl.  Or do you have a different way forward for that?

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company








view thread (83+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <BBE6CE62-1960-4A0D-89EB-73EF773FB802@enterprisedb.com>
Permalink:  ../BBE6CE62-1960-4A0D-89EB-73EF773FB802@enterprisedb.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/BBE6CE62-1960-4A0D-89EB-73EF773FB802@enterprisedb.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com, pg@bowt.ie, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andrew@dunslane.net, robertmhaas@gmail.com, pashkin.elfe@gmail.com, exclusion@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
  In-Reply-To: <BBE6CE62-1960-4A0D-89EB-73EF773FB802@enterprisedb.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox