agora inbox for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>
To: 陈列行 <2320415112@qq.com>
To: pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: BUG #19572: Redundant predicate changes JIT decision and causes an 18x performance difference
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 08:48:29 -0300
Message-ID: <DKCQEBNRSEHK.1BWKETIC2RW84@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_10669405A4B4ACADC37A29811DDD81AC260A@qq.com>
References: <19572-f770e89412629023@postgresql.org>
<DKB8Q0DL1Y1C.177HDXZVZ0G6U@gmail.com>
<tencent_10669405A4B4ACADC37A29811DDD81AC260A@qq.com>
On Thu Jul 30, 2026 at 3:44 AM -03, =?utf-8?B?6ZmI5YiX6KGM?= wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed analysis.
>
>
> You are completely right—the query produces correct results, so it's
> an estimation/costing issue rather than a correctness bug.
>
>
> Regarding whether it's worth addressing: In real-world applications,
> especially those using ORMs or complex auto-generated SQL, redundant
> predicates (or transitive quals across joins) are actually quite
> common. When a redundant qual causes the estimated row count to drop
> significantly, it can severely distort the plan choice or prematurely
> cross cost thresholds (like JIT enablement, as seen here).
>
Yeah, I'm not surprised that ORMs may generate such queries. I've posted
about this on -hackers [1].
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/DKBX1KUW8KUW.2DU5RD192DHIQ%40gmail.com
--
Matheus Alcantara
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
view thread (3+ messages)
Message-ID: <DKCQEBNRSEHK.1BWKETIC2RW84@gmail.com>
Permalink: ../DKCQEBNRSEHK.1BWKETIC2RW84@gmail.com/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/DKCQEBNRSEHK.1BWKETIC2RW84@gmail.com
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: matheusssilv97@gmail.com, 2320415112@qq.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #19572: Redundant predicate changes JIT decision and causes an 18x performance difference
In-Reply-To: <DKCQEBNRSEHK.1BWKETIC2RW84@gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox