pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs mailing list <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 11:26:57 +0100
Message-ID: <Y3YMcdBQEBgGwq+Y@depesz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221117072512.q3fayfyd5ugfwvmf@awork3.anarazel.de>
References: <Yz2hivgyjS1RfMKs@depesz.com>
	<CAA4eK1JTE0tLgR5qzVECrKJV5VVTnDa0k5LQ4TOkBAA=MySj3g@mail.gmail.com>
	<Y00cp4sNQtFNoo25@depesz.com>
	<CAA4eK1KUMFfVrOpP7VgAPUN7rabvfr5GhcQh++T8BX-t7=e5YA@mail.gmail.com>
	<Y0/bSiDkYlhiSmOW@depesz.com>
	<Y1E3JIFqb0mFBZNR@depesz.com>
	<Y25hQCKLnolQaFN9@depesz.com>
	<20221117072512.q3fayfyd5ugfwvmf@awork3.anarazel.de>

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:25:12PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Perhaps a stupid question - are you using max_slot_wal_keep_size? And what's
> your wal_segment_size? And wal_keep_size?

Are we talking about pg12 side?

=> select name, setting from pg_settings where name ~ 'wal';
             name             │  setting
══════════════════════════════╪═══════════
 max_wal_senders              │ 50
 max_wal_size                 │ 49152
 min_wal_size                 │ 256
 wal_block_size               │ 8192
 wal_buffers                  │ 2048
 wal_compression              │ on
 wal_consistency_checking     │
 wal_init_zero                │ on
 wal_keep_segments            │ 1000
 wal_level                    │ logical
 wal_log_hints                │ off
 wal_receiver_status_interval │ 10
 wal_receiver_timeout         │ 60000
 wal_recycle                  │ on
 wal_retrieve_retry_interval  │ 5000
 wal_segment_size             │ 16777216
 wal_sender_timeout           │ 60000
 wal_sync_method              │ fdatasync
 wal_writer_delay             │ 200
 wal_writer_flush_after       │ 128
(20 rows)

max_slot_wal_keep_size was added in pg13, afaik. and wel_keep_* was
_segments in pg 12.

Best regards,

depesz






view thread (57+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <Y3YMcdBQEBgGwq+Y@depesz.com>
Permalink:  ../Y3YMcdBQEBgGwq+Y@depesz.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/Y3YMcdBQEBgGwq+Y@depesz.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: depesz@depesz.com, andres@anarazel.de, horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp, amit.kapila16@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  In-Reply-To: <Y3YMcdBQEBgGwq+Y@depesz.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox