pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: exclusion@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18240: Undefined behaviour in cash_mul_flt8() and friends
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 05:37:19 -0500
Message-ID: <ZXg33020jpsKYlCq@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZXgh74Ykj3iWvXKr@paquier.xyz>
References: <18240-c5da758d7dc1ecf0@postgresql.org>
	<ZXbi3xo7QhQIe1YN@paquier.xyz>
	<2171714.1702307153@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<ZXgh74Ykj3iWvXKr@paquier.xyz>

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 10:03:43AM +0100, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:05:53AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Yeah, approximately none of cash.c pays any attention to the risks
> > of overflow/underflow.  Improving that situation would be a good
> > finger exercise for some aspiring hacker, perhaps.  Although I bet
> > somebody will ask again why it is that we continue to support the
> > money type.
> 
> AFAIK, we discourage the use of money in the wiki for quite a few
> years:
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Don%27t_Do_This#Don.27t_use_money
> 
> And numeric has much better code coverage and support.  I am wondering
> whether we've reached the point where it would be better to remove it
> entirely from the tree, and just tell people to use numeric.  This has
> a cost for upgrades, where we should cross check for its use but there
> is already check_for_data_type_usage() to do this job so the facility
> is there.

Yes, probably.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.





view thread (24+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <ZXg33020jpsKYlCq@momjian.us>
Permalink:  ../ZXg33020jpsKYlCq@momjian.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/ZXg33020jpsKYlCq@momjian.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: bruce@momjian.us, michael@paquier.xyz, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, exclusion@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: BUG #18240: Undefined behaviour in cash_mul_flt8() and friends
  In-Reply-To: <ZXg33020jpsKYlCq@momjian.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox