public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
To: Fujii Masao <[email protected]>
Cc: Sergei Kornilov <[email protected]>
Cc: Олег Самойлов <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: basic_archive lost archive_directory
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 15:38:47 -0600
Message-ID: <aZzI59OB6SaChOgJ@nathan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYzxJy0icsGM1A6u@nathan>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<1317421770387925@cea5cfd9-50d3-4d85-a924-a7cc75f8f215>
	<CAHGQGwF3tFP=oQgYHoS3h9TMeFbZwXc6+xdPTW8CkMV2TkjTmg@mail.gmail.com>
	<aYpYaRipZ_-lYxNY@nathan>
	<CAHGQGwFzC+HYEwJGhpmu1NBiQp_Ln8t0z9CDt8QCQDnUtFAFYA@mail.gmail.com>
	<aYtXgaKfiYpaqQyW@nathan>
	<aYzxJy0icsGM1A6u@nathan>

On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 03:14:15PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 10:06:25AM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> As I mentioned upthread, IMHO we should simply remove the existence check
>> from the GUC check hook.  basic_archive must already be written to handle
>> the archive directory disappearing at any moment, so we should be able to
>> rely on it without the extra stat().
> 
> Concretely, like the attached.

Any thoughts?  I'll wait another week or so, but then will proceed with
committing/back-patching this.

-- 
nathan

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: basic_archive lost archive_directory
  In-Reply-To: <aZzI59OB6SaChOgJ@nathan>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox