From: Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>
To: Andreas Rogge <andreas.rogge@bareos.com>
To: pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18833: libpq.so doesn't contain declared symbol in rpm --provides
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 17:32:00 +0300
Message-ID: <beffb1ce0e9136e7f5e151ac00bd65d895d05dc1.camel@gunduz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d6ee524-869f-41c4-b2d4-1fae3854b43c@bareos.com>
References: <202503110911.3ch36e6l4w5n@alvherre.pgsql>
<1809308.9hSmTKtgW7@x-wing>
<56f3cdf2fd2dee3553c08473438377e8a9f881e3.camel@cybertec.at>
<12447006.8bMQJbFj6T@x-wing>
<159a80a731ccf6126f20f7a50ce708a905407798.camel@cybertec.at>
<9d6ee524-869f-41c4-b2d4-1fae3854b43c@bareos.com>
Hi,
On Tue, 2025-03-11 at 18:36 +0100, Andreas Rogge wrote:
> I don't know what you claim, but your libpq5 RPM claims that the
> contained libpq.so.5 has versioned symbols for versions RHPG_9.6,
> RHPG_10, [...] and RHPG_15 while the contained library doesn't have
> these.
> When a package says it provides something and then doesn't, I call
> that a broken package.
We don't provide versioned *symbols*. It is just provides. Why would we
match Red Hat packaging?
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 857B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: devrim@gunduz.org, andreas.rogge@bareos.com, pgsql-pkg-yum@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18833: libpq.so doesn't contain declared symbol in rpm --provides
In-Reply-To: <beffb1ce0e9136e7f5e151ac00bd65d895d05dc1.camel@gunduz.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox