From: 谭忠涛 <zhongtao.tan@seaboxdata.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: 回复：Re: Performance Issue when using gin index
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 14:25:06 +0800
Message-ID: <tencent_4804F2BE463D60454F8BA22C@qq.com> (raw)
I'm sorry I was too hasty and didn't read the manual carefully.
Regards
Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 在 2025年1月21日 周二 11:01 写道：
"=?utf-8?B?6LCt5b+g5rab?=" <zhongtao.tan@seaboxdata.com> writes:
> The performance of creating a gin index before inserting data is different from that of inserting data after creating a gin index.
This isn't terribly surprising. Read
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/gin.html#GIN-FAST-UPDATE
There's also useful info in
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/gin.html#GIN-TIPS
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: zhongtao.tan@seaboxdata.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 回复：Re: Performance Issue when using gin index
In-Reply-To: <tencent_4804F2BE463D60454F8BA22C@qq.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox