From: tgl@postgresql.org
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Subject: pgsql: Add a comment documenting the question of whether PrefetchBuffer
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 18:17:43 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <20090403181743.63F0A754ADE@cvs.postgresql.org> (raw)
Log Message:
-----------
Add a comment documenting the question of whether PrefetchBuffer should
try to protect an already-existing buffer from being evicted. This was
left as an open issue when the posix_fadvise patch was committed. I'm
not sure there's any evidence to justify more work in this area, but we
should have some record about it in the source code.
Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql/src/backend/storage/buffer:
bufmgr.c (r1.250 -> r1.251)
(http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c?r1=1.250&r2=1...)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add a comment documenting the question of whether PrefetchBuffer
In-Reply-To: <20090403181743.63F0A754ADE@cvs.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox