From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <momjian@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:50:13 +0300
Message-ID: <200904272150.14482.peter_e@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090427171027.GL1539@fetter.org>
References: <20090427162736.9DEF575407D@cvs.postgresql.org>
<20090427171027.GL1539@fetter.org>
On Monday 27 April 2009 20:10:27 David Fetter wrote:
> While we're at it, can we see about moving foreign keys out of the
> "advanced" section? They've been standard for many years. Heck, even
> MySQL has had them, at least in some of their engines, for many years.
Advanced doesn't have to mean nonstandard, and standard doesn't have to mean
basic.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Cc: peter_e@gmx.net, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, david@fetter.org, momjian@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation
In-Reply-To: <200904272150.14482.peter_e@gmx.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox