pg.ddx.io  pgsql-committers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Generational memory allocator
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 12:00:15 -0800
Message-ID: <20171125200014.qbewtip5oydqsklt@alap3.anarazel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8991.1511639441@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <E1eHa4J-0006hI-Q8@gemulon.postgresql.org>
	<20171123001649.y2nf7422iay6cw3v@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<CANP8+jKoT=Pg5W_3FcKiDf+FMrJhFYacxt_g5E0=tkmb5s8M6g@mail.gmail.com>
	<c903f275-2150-fa52-64bf-dca7b53ebf8d@fuzzy.cz>
	<16449.1511548313@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<4618.1511573138@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<bf84d940-90d4-de91-19dd-612e011007f4@fuzzy.cz>
	<6189.1511587105@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<8991.1511639441@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Hi,

On 2017-11-25 14:50:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz> writes:
> >> BTW I also see these failures in hstore:
>
> >> ==15168== Source and destination overlap in memcpy(0x5d0fed0, 0x5d0fed0, 40)
> >> ==15168==    at 0x4C2E00C: memcpy@@GLIBC_2.14 (vg_replace_strmem.c:1018)
> >> ==15168==    by 0x15419A06: hstoreUniquePairs (hstore_io.c:343)
> >> ==15168==    by 0x15419EE4: hstore_in (hstore_io.c:416)
>
> > Huh ...
>
> I tried to duplicate this on my RHEL6 workstation, and failed to,
> even though adding an assertion easily proves that the hstore
> regression test does exercise the case.  So apparently the answer
> as to why skink isn't reporting this is just "not all versions of
> valgrind check it".

I suspect that the issue rather is that the compiler will sometimes
replace the memcpy() with an in-line member-by-member version. That'll
not be visible as a memcpy to valgrind.


> Meanwhile, skink has come back with a success as of 0f2458f, rendering
> the other mystery even deeper --- although at least this confirms the
> idea that the crashes we are seeing predate the generation.c patch.

Hm, wonder whether that could be optimization dependent too.

Greetings,

Andres Freund




view thread (37+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20171125200014.qbewtip5oydqsklt@alap3.anarazel.de>
Permalink:  ../20171125200014.qbewtip5oydqsklt@alap3.anarazel.de/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20171125200014.qbewtip5oydqsklt@alap3.anarazel.de

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
  Cc: andres@anarazel.de, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, tv@fuzzy.cz, simon@2ndquadrant.com
  Subject: Re: pgsql: Generational memory allocator
  In-Reply-To: <20171125200014.qbewtip5oydqsklt@alap3.anarazel.de>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox