From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Remove pqsignal() from libpq's official exports list.
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:59:16 +0900
Message-ID: <20191007065916.GH14532@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191004095630.GA29119@msg.df7cb.de>
References: <E1g5vmT-0003K1-6S@gemulon.postgresql.org>
<20191004095630.GA29119@msg.df7cb.de>
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 11:56:31AM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> This is starting to hurt in several places:
>
> 04 11:41 <magnush> mha@xindi:~$ psql
> 04 11:41 <magnush> /usr/lib/postgresql/9.2/bin/psql: symbol lookup error:
> /usr/lib/postgresql/9.2/bin/psql: undefined symbol: pqsignal
>
> pg_repack linked against libpq5 11 breaks with libpq5 12:
Ouch. So that's commit f7ab802. I agree that this is not cool, and
libpq so version is not likely going to be bumped up (if that happens
I have code I could wipe out). Could we reconsider this decision? It
seems to me that we should not silently break things.
--
Michael
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, myon@debian.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Remove pqsignal() from libpq's official exports list.
In-Reply-To: <20191007065916.GH14532@paquier.xyz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox