From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: doc: fix wording describing the checkpoint_flush_after GUC
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 12:31:42 +0100
Message-ID: <202311131131.pmrvuac6ziy2@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1r1DsD-004iFI-Iv@gemulon.postgresql.org>
On 2023-Nov-09, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> doc: fix wording describing the checkpoint_flush_after GUC
Hmm. Is this new wording really more clear than the original wording?
I agree the original may not have been the most simple, but I don't
think it was wrong English.
I'm not suggesting to revert this change, but rather I'd like to prevent
future changes of this type. Just saying it'd be sad to turn all the
Postgres documentation to using Basic English or whatever.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"La fuerza no está en los medios físicos
sino que reside en una voluntad indomable" (Gandhi)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, bruce@momjian.us, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: doc: fix wording describing the checkpoint_flush_after GUC
In-Reply-To: <202311131131.pmrvuac6ziy2@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox