From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jeff Davis <jdavis@postgresql.org>
Cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Disk-based Hash Aggregation.
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 02:05:06 -0400
Message-ID: <23196.1584943506@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1jEhaL-0002Ur-2L@gemulon.postgresql.org>
References: <E1jEhaL-0002Ur-2L@gemulon.postgresql.org>
Jeff Davis <jdavis@postgresql.org> writes:
> Disk-based Hash Aggregation.
I noticed that the regression tests seemed suddenly slower than they
have been. A bit of poking around reveals that this patch made
groupingsets.sql take approximately 8X longer than it used to,
and more than twice as long as any other core regression test.
This is absolutely, positively, not acceptable for a test that gets
run hundreds of times a day by lots of people and buildfarm animals.
If there's no way to test the feature in some significantly-cheaper way,
perhaps we should move this test out to a separate script that's not run
by default.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, jdavis@postgresql.org, pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Disk-based Hash Aggregation.
In-Reply-To: <23196.1584943506@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox