From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix dependency handling of column drop with partitioned tables
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 16:29:10 -0400
Message-ID: <26257.1570998550@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191013101331.GC1434@paquier.xyz>
References: <E1iJZdr-0005DB-GE@gemulon.postgresql.org>
<20191013101331.GC1434@paquier.xyz>
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:54:19AM +0000, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Fix dependency handling of column drop with partitioned tables
> rhinoceros is unhappy with this one in the sepgsql tests as this has
> moved a cascading drop notice when droping a column:
> ...
> It seems to me that it would be fine to just update the output to
> the newly-expected behavior. Any opinions?
Yeah, that sounds good to me.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, michael@paquier.xyz, pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix dependency handling of column drop with partitioned tables
In-Reply-To: <26257.1570998550@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox