From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <jdavis@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: inet_net_pton.c: use pg_ascii_tolower() rather than tolower().
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 13:56:53 -0700
Message-ID: <29C24939-385E-45AD-9062-4A3F324F5D1C@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <798477.1749587510@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <E1uP3e6-00139L-1h@gemulon.postgresql.org>
<60e8c6d0a6c08e67f15dbbe9e53df0119c710065.camel@j-davis.com>
<798477.1749587510@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 10 June 2025 13:31:50 GMT-07:00, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
>> On Tue, 2025-06-10 at 18:24 +0000, Jeff Davis wrote:
>>> inet_net_pton.c: use pg_ascii_tolower() rather than tolower().
>
>> These 4 small patches were somewhat of a "false start" on 19 -- sorry
>> about that. Not sure if it's worth it to revert them and reapply in a
>> couple weeks, as they look pretty harmless.
>
>Ask the RMT, I guess. I don't have any objection, but they
>have final say at this stage.
Seems fine by me to include it in v18.
- Heikki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Cc: hlinnaka@iki.fi, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql@j-davis.com, jdavis@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: inet_net_pton.c: use pg_ascii_tolower() rather than tolower().
In-Reply-To: <29C24939-385E-45AD-9062-4A3F324F5D1C@iki.fi>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox