pg.ddx.io  pgsql-committers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Rémi Zara <remi_zara@mac.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:44:27 -0500
Message-ID: <5195.1582580667@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200224211709.GA6996@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20200224211709.GA6996@alvherre.pgsql>

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2020-Feb-24, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Why not just drive it off max_files_per_process?  On Unix, that
>> largely exists to override the ulimit setting anyway.  With no
>> comparable knob on a Windows system, we might as well just say
>> that's what you set.

> That makes sense to me -- but if we do that, then maybe we should be
> doing the setrlimit() dance on it too, on Linux^W^W where supported.

Yeah, arguably we could try to setrlimit if max_files_per_process is
larger than the ulimit.  We should definitely not reduce the ulimit
if max_files_per_process is smaller, though, since the DBA might
intentionally be leaving daylight for purposes such as FD-hungry PL
functions.  On the whole I'm inclined to leave well enough alone on
the Unix side --- there's nothing there that the DBA can't set if
she wishes.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (36+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <5195.1582580667@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../5195.1582580667@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/5195.1582580667@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, thomas.munro@gmail.com, remi_zara@mac.com, michael@paquier.xyz, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: pgsql: Add kqueue(2) support to the WaitEventSet API.
  In-Reply-To: <5195.1582580667@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox