pg.ddx.io  pgsql-committers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Jeff Davis <jdavis@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Catalog changes preparing for builtin collation provider.
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 19:53:41 -0800
Message-ID: <8899c7c62b86370076110920686fd24863b69a01.camel@j-davis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1rj5WA-002z5V-WA@gemulon.postgresql.org>
References: <E1rj5WA-002z5V-WA@gemulon.postgresql.org>

On Sat, 2024-03-09 at 22:50 +0000, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Catalog changes preparing for builtin collation provider.

This is causing problems on a couple buildfarm members (mantid,
lapwing, snakefly) that all look like this:

# Running: pg_upgrade --no-sync -d
/home/postgres/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/bin/pg_upgrade/tmp_check/
t_002_pg_upgrade_old_node_data/pgdata -D
/home/postgres/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/bin/pg_upgrade/tmp_check/
t_002_pg_upgrade_new_node_data/pgdata -b
/home/postgres/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/tmp_install/home/postgres/bui
ldroot/HEAD/inst/bin -B
/home/postgres/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/tmp_install/home/postgres/bui
ldroot/HEAD/inst/bin -s /tmp/3b07YyaACZ -p 52828 -P 52829 --copy --
check
[01:08:08.992](1.053s) ok 9 - invalid database causes failure status
(got 1 vs expected 1)
[01:08:08.992](0.001s) ok 10 - invalid database causes failure stdout
/(?^:invalid)/
[01:08:08.993](0.001s) not ok 11 - invalid database causes failure
stderr /(?^:)/
[01:08:08.993](0.000s) 
[01:08:08.993](0.000s) #   Failed test 'invalid database causes failure
stderr /(?^:)/'
[01:08:08.993](0.000s) #   at t/002_pg_upgrade.pl line 370.
[01:08:08.994](0.000s) #                   ''
#     doesn't match '(?^:)'


That's a little confusing to me: the '(?^:)' is just qr//, which should
match anything, right?

It's expecting stderr to be empty, and the test failure seems to
indicate it is empty, so again I don't really see the problem.

Am I missing something obvious here?

Quite a few other members are passing and I didn't find an obvious
pattern yet.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis






view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <8899c7c62b86370076110920686fd24863b69a01.camel@j-davis.com>
Permalink:  ../8899c7c62b86370076110920686fd24863b69a01.camel@j-davis.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/8899c7c62b86370076110920686fd24863b69a01.camel@j-davis.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
  Cc: pgsql@j-davis.com, jdavis@postgresql.org, pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: pgsql: Catalog changes preparing for builtin collation provider.
  In-Reply-To: <8899c7c62b86370076110920686fd24863b69a01.camel@j-davis.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox