From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: pgsql: Update pg_upgrade test for reg* to include regrole and regnamesp
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 01:18:49 +0000
Message-ID: <E1gRS1Z-0007fX-M5@gemulon.postgresql.org> (raw)
Update pg_upgrade test for reg* to include regrole and regnamespace.
When the regrole (0c90f6769) and regnamespace (cb9fa802b) types were
added in 9.5, pg_upgrade's check for reg* types wasn't updated. While
regrole currently is safe, regnamespace is not.
It seems unlikely that anybody uses regnamespace inside catalog tables
across a pg_upgrade, but the tests should be correct nevertheless.
While at it, reorder the types checked in the query to be
alphabetical. Otherwise it's annoying to compare existing and tested
for types.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/037e152a-cb25-3bcb-4f35-bdc9988f8204@2ndQuadrant.com
Backpatch: 9.5-, as regrole/regnamespace
Branch
------
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/17024c08e8e07bebdb02917304c4aa2a9004d917
Modified Files
--------------
src/bin/pg_upgrade/check.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Cc: andres@anarazel.de, pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Update pg_upgrade test for reg* to include regrole and regnamesp
In-Reply-To: <E1gRS1Z-0007fX-M5@gemulon.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox