From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: pgsql: Remove obsolete comment
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:21:00 +0000
Message-ID: <E1rnYGy-0053CZ-1J@gemulon.postgresql.org> (raw)
Remove obsolete comment
The idea to use a union in the definition of RangeTblEntry is clearly
not being pursued.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/4b27fc50-8cd6-46f5-ab20-88dbaadca645@eisentraut.org
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/83d8065b1f7477f4fb49e53ece0e6e0e516993fe
Modified Files
--------------
src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Cc: peter@eisentraut.org, pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Remove obsolete comment
In-Reply-To: <E1rnYGy-0053CZ-1J@gemulon.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox