From: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: pgsql: Update nbits_set in brin_bloom_union
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 16:17:35 +0000
Message-ID: <E1rw2Xu-0022SP-Hq@gemulon.postgresql.org> (raw)
Update nbits_set in brin_bloom_union
Properly update the number of bits set in the bitmap after merging the
filters in brin_bloom_union.
This is mostly harmless, as the counter is used only in the output
function, which means pageinspect may show incorrect information about
the BRIN summary. The counter does not affect correctness.
Discovered while adding a regression test comparing indexes built with
and without parallelism. The parallel index builds exercise the union
procedure when merging results from workers, which is otherwise very
hard to do in a test. Which is why this went unnoticed until now.
Backpatch through 14, where the BRIN bloom opclasses were introduced.
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1df00a66-db5a-4e66-809a-99b386a06d86%40enterprisedb.com
Branch
------
REL_15_STABLE
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/3cd4135119be0dda37ef810353a3ef2e4444970e
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/access/brin/brin_bloom.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
Cc: tomas.vondra@postgresql.org, pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Update nbits_set in brin_bloom_union
In-Reply-To: <E1rw2Xu-0022SP-Hq@gemulon.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox